Skip to main content

Addressing the worldwide shortages of face masks

Abstract

The year 2020 will be punctuated by coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the history of human civilization. Within four months, COVID-19 has become a public healthcare crisis in all nations around the world. Until a suitable vaccine is found and made widely available, the immediate solutions to protect individuals and to control the spread of the pandemic include wearing a face mask, maintaining personal hygiene, and social distancing. Certified face masks have become national essentials, and countries have imposed restrictions on exports, which has increased the worldwide shortages of masks and raw materials. This situation has also led to confusion and misinformation about face masks. This paper aims to provide quality information on face masks to alleviate the shortages. Disinfecting used masks and making homemade masks are discussed as emergency solutions. The development and manufacture of innovative masks (such as reusable masks, antivirus masks, and degradable masks) have become essential needs of society and involve both opportunities and challenges during this unprecedented time. In this prospective study, we provide the definitions, basic requirements, materials, possible preparation methods, and challenges of these innovative masks and highlight their important role in preventing epidemics similar to COVID-19.

Background

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has caused major changes in nearly every aspect of life in the first 6 months of 2020 [1]. The number of confirmed cases is close to 6.5 million, and new cases increase by ~ 100,000 per day (as of June 5, 2020) [2]. Until a suitable vaccine is developed and made widely available, wearing a protective facemask, personal hygiene and social distancing are ubiquitously followed to prevent the spread of the virus. Certified face masks have become national essentials. The COVID-19 outbreak in China, which produces half of the world’s face masks, has generated a twofold challenge: there is surging domestic demand and a major disruption to the global supply. It is estimated that 89 million medical masks will be required every month and a 40% increase in manufacturing is expected to meet the global demand [3]. Because masks protect people from viral infection, there is a worldwide surge in the use of billions of face masks every day. This situation will continue and has accentuated the worldwide shortages of masks. The situation also led to confusion and misinformation about face masks. Here, we discuss issues such as (A) the transmission of the virus, (B) different types of masks and their intended purposes, (C) the effectiveness of masks in controlling the pandemic, (D) different designs of masks and their usefulness, (E) different manufacturing methods and production strategies, (F) the effectiveness of disinfection or sterilization methods for reusing masks, (G) anti-viral masks, (H) environmentally friendly degradable masks, (I) materials selection and strategies, and (J) standards and methods for testing and evaluation of the performance of masks. Overall, the purpose of this manuscript is to provide facts about face masks to alleviate shortages.

Main text

The transmission of SARS-CoV-2

The virus called severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is the main cause of the disease outbreak (Fig. 1). Similar to SARS-CoV (a virus outbreak in 2003), SARS-CoV-2 can combine with angiotensin-converting enzyme 2 (ACE2) to invade the human body. The infected patient exhibits flu-like symptoms accompanied by increased body temperature or cough. Severely affected patients may develop pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). Because SARS-CoV-2 can make better use of ACE2, it can invade the human body more easily than SARS-CoV [5]. Statistics indicate that the R0 value (i.e., the average number of other patients to whom an infectious disease is transmitted from one patient) of SARS-CoV-2 is almost double that of SARS-CoV (5.7 vs 3.2) [6, 7]. More importantly, since the virus has a long incubation period (3–20 days) and given the presence of asymptomatic carriers, preventing transmission of SARS-CoV-2 is challenging.

Fig. 1
figure1

Structure of SARS-CoV-2. Reproduced with permission from [4]. Copyright 2020, https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0

Generally, ACE2 expression in the lung is only a few molecules per alveolar cell. Surprisingly, a recently published paper reported that ACE2 is highly expressed in some types of cells of the inner nose [8]. Therefore, when the virus enters the nasal cavity, it can easily combine with ACE2 to invade human cells. Short-range aerosols and droplets are the main routes of SARS-CoV-2 transmission (Fig. 2) [9]. The virus is released into the air when an infected person breathes, coughs, sneezes, or even sings. Singing has been found to be comparable to continuous coughing in the transmission of airborne pathogens [10], as demonstrated by a choir practice on March 10, 2020, in Washington state, USA. Choir members stated that they did not touch each other during the practice; but 45 out of the 60 members were diagnosed with the SARS-CoV-2 virus within 3 weeks, and two of them unfortunately passed away.

Fig. 2
figure2

Transmission mode of SARS-CoV-2 from human-to-human

Classification of masks

Masks can be divided into four categories according to their filtering capacity (Table 1): (1) face-covering masks (for example, homemade cloth masks), (2) surgical masks, (3) medical protective masks (mainly used to prevent airborne particles, such as N95 and FFP masks), and (4) occupational protective masks (mainly used for occupational protection, such as particulate and gas respirators). To provide respiratory protection against particles or airborne, masks should meet a particulate filtration efficiency of 80% or more.

Table 1 Classification and characteristics of masks

“Masking strategy” to decrease community transmission of the virus

At the beginning of the outbreak, each country adopted different epidemic prevention measures. The policies include school and workplace closures, cancellation of public events and gatherings, stay-at-home restrictions, and testing and contact tracing. Most European and American countries recommend that residents stay at home and follow up to isolate infected and potentially infected persons. The number of infected people in these countries continues to rise after approximately two months of measures. Some countries, such as Italy, Germany, France, Singapore, and the United Kingdom, have recently (as of the end of May 2020) begun to encourage residents to wear masks. The curve of these countries started to flatten (Fig. 3).

Fig. 3
figure3

As of May 18, 2020, the confirmed cases of COVID-19 in several countries. Data collected from WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation reports [11]

In contrast, due to cultural differences, many East Asian countries encouraged or even mandated that everyone wear masks from the beginning of the outbreak. These countries have flattened the curve, even at the initial stage (such as Japan and South Korea, Fig. 3).

Statistics show that after the lifting of the lockdown on April 8 in Wuhan, China (the city where the outbreak began), the number of infections has increased only slightly due to the continued implementation of the masking policy. Currently (May 2020), most cities in China have basically returned to normal economic order under the premise of wearing masks. Similar countries include Japan and South Korea.

In a study published on April 22, 2020, researchers proposed two artificial intelligence (AI) models designed to predict the impact of wearing masks on the spread of the new coronavirus [12]. One of the models attempts to predict the shielding effect of wearing a mask compared to other measures (mainly closures and physical distance). By changing the parameters that affect the degree of interaction and the average number of intimate contacts, researchers can use the model to measure various degrees of social alienation and blockade measures. The AI simulation showed that when the adoption rate reached 80%, the degree to which the infection curve flattened due to mask wearing was much greater than the degree to which it flattened due to closure (the former caused 60,000 deaths, while the latter caused 180,000, a three-fold difference). At the same time, the 50% mask penetration rate is not sufficient to prevent continued spread (which will cause 240,000 deaths). Since May 31, 2020, social isolation replaced strict closures; unless masks are worn, the spread will be uncontrollable.

The second model uses agent-based technology, and each agent “wears” different kinds of masks. These simulation results show that if a mask is worn early enough, even if the mask is nonmedical or homemade, it can reduce the spread of the virus. If the mask adoption rate reaches 100% during an outbreak, the number of infections will be “dramatically” reduced.

Both models indicate that if 80% of people start wearing cloth masks in public places before the lockdown is lifted, the spread of the outbreak will be limited enough to lift the lockdown and avoid a second wave of infections. If masking measures are not taken, once the lockdown is lifted, even if social isolation continues, the virus will still infect almost half of the population. If 100% of the population wears masks, even after 300 days, the curve will remain at basically a constant level, and the prevalence rate will be less than 10% when society is completely liberalized.

These simulation results are consistent with the actual data, at least so far (as of the end of May 2020). Therefore, governments and international agencies have suggested using masking strategies as one of the key tools in the epidemic prevention policy. Since this virus is expected to affect humans for some time, people may have to wear masks for a long time in the future.

Strategies for alleviating shortages of masks

Statistics and theoretical simulations have confirmed that mask-wearing plays an important role in controlling the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, the problem faced by many governments is that they are unable to provide enough masks for everyone, especially for frontline medical staff. Furthermore, the disposable masks currently used add a new source of pollution to society. This is not only a waste of resources but also further increases the burden on the ecological environment.

There are several strategies that have the potential to solve the problem of the shortage of masks (Fig. 4). Disinfecting used masks using appropriate methods and making homemade masks are two emergency solutions in times of mask shortage. In the long run, innovative masks, including reusable masks, antivirus masks, and degradable masks, will be of great significance for virus protection and environmental protection and to alleviate shortages of masks.

Fig. 4
figure4

Strategies for alleviating shortages of masks

Sterilization methods for reusing masks

For filtering facepiece respirators (FFRs), the sterilization strategies for the extended use and reuse are currently available from the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) [13]. The reduce of the pathogen burden, maintain the function of the FFRs, and present no residual chemical hazard are expected for an effective mask decontamination.

VHP, UVGI, and MH are the most promising disinfection strategy toward the used FFRs (method and performance have been listed in Table 2). It worth noting that many of these methods can only be used for limited times. No current data support the effectiveness of these decontamination methods for FFRs specifically against SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, even after decontamination, these FFRs should be handled carefully.

Table 2 Sterilization method and effect on mask performance

Liao et al. [14] also provided advice on sterilization methods and the durability of N95 respirators. Their experimental results show that the filtering performance of the N95 respirator can be maintained for approximately 50 cycles by heating (dry or in the presence of humidity) < 100 °C. The ultraviolet (UV) irradiation method is also useful, but it can only last for 20 cycles. Other methods, including soaking in ethanol and chlorine-based disinfection water for a short time, greatly reduce the filtration performance of N95 respirators.

For the commonly used commercial surgical mask, there are currently no corresponding experimental data that can support a reasonable method of disinfection and reuse. The filter layer of these masks is made of PP non-woven fabric with a diameter of 0.5–1 µm. This is the same as the filter layer of N95 and FFP masks except that the thickness of the filter layer in the surgical mask is thinner. According to the above disinfection experience for N95 and FFP masks, moist heat and ultraviolet irradiation may be an efficient optional disinfection method for the commonly used surgical mask. It is worth noting that this can only be used as an emergency measure when no mask is available. Because the quality of commercial masks and the sources of raw materials differ, the results may vary greatly when using a sterilization method for masks from different manufacturers. Governments or industry associations can encourage mask manufacturers to provide appropriate disinfection methods and performance data for their products by establishing relevant standards, which will have a positive effect on alleviating the shortage of masks.

Homemade masks

The use of homemade masks is an emergency measure for epidemic protection under the premise of a shortage of masks. This type of mask is also called a cloth face covering since most of these masks are made of fabrics that are available in the home.

The CDC recommends wearing cloth face coverings in public settings where other social distancing measures are difficult to maintain (e.g., grocery stores and pharmacies), especially in areas of significant community-based transmission [15]. It also advises the use of simple cloth face coverings to slow the spread of the virus and help people who may have the virus and not know it from transmitting it to others. Cloth face coverings fashioned from household items or made at home from common materials at low cost can be used as an additional, voluntary public health measure.

Researchers from the University of Chicago conducted a timely study and showed that by reasonably selecting and matching fabrics, even homemade masks can achieve more than 95% filtration efficiency (Table 3).

Table 3 Comparison of the filtration performance of masks made of different materials [16]

We provide suggestions for homemade masks with regard to materials: (i) the filtration performance of single-layer fabrics is usually poor, and the use of multiple layers (> 4 layers) can provide better protection for individuals; (ii) since synthetic fibers rubbing against each other may generate static electricity, the filtering performance of synthetic fiber fabrics (such as polyester, nylon, or acrylic) may be better than that of natural fiber fabrics (cotton or cellulose fiber); (iii) the use of cotton fabrics combined with synthetic fiber fabrics may maintain the uniformity of static electricity.

It is worth noting that current research on homemade masks is still insufficient. Many suggestions are based on experience, and there is not enough scientific basis for reference. Opportunities for future studies include examining how long the virus can survive on this type of mask, standard disinfection and cleaning procedures, and whether the wearing environment affects the performance of the covering mask. Until these problems are scientifically supported, homemade masks can only be an emergency measure to solve the shortage of masks.

Reusable masks

Due to the shortages, demand and supply mismatch, and inaccessibility due to high prices in several countries, the reusability of medical grade masks has been considered to satisfy the growing demand. Many information and self-help videos on the internet explain how to make cloth-type reusable masks and use them properly [15]. Creative ideas and innovations on how to improve the filtration efficiency of cloth-type reusable masks are also available [16].

With regard to the reusability of standard surgical face masks, a good reusable mask against COVID-19 should provide high particulate filtration efficiency and bacterial filtration efficiency comparable to standard surgical masks. A good reusable mask should have durability. In other words, after proper disinfection or washing, its appearance, fit, filtration efficiency and breathing resistance should not change significantly. A quality reusable mask should meet the requirements of relevant standards (the key criteria are extracted from the standards and listed in Table 4) after being disinfected or washed using an appropriate method. Furthermore, it is expected that such masks can still meet the requirements of relevant standards after 50 (or more) proper sterilization treatments.

Table 4 Standards for facepiece respirators

In principle, the filtering efficiency of the mask is the decisive factor. The masks commonly used at present (including surgical masks, N95 and FFP masks) are filtered by the mechanism of static electricity (electrostatic electret treatment of melt-blown non-woven filter). This filtering method is very effective for particles with a diameter of less than 0.3 µm, and it can usually achieve more than 90% filtration efficiency. However, static electricity is easily lost, especially after washing or wearing for a long time; hence, this type of mask is meant to be disposable.

For the design of a reusable mask, there is a more effective filter called the “nanofiber filter” that does not rely on static electricity to filter dust and droplets. It uses a smaller pore size and good pore distribution to physically filter aerosol particulates comprising viruses or harmful dust [17]. After use, it can be disinfected in a suitable way. As long as the physical structure of the nanofiber filter is not damaged, it will maintain the original filtration performance. Using this filtration mechanism, Korean scientists have prepared reusable mask prototypes with nanofibers [18]. After undergoing 20 rounds of washing with an ethanol sterilizing solution, the nanofiber design was able to successfully filter 94% of contaminants (namely, bacteria with ethanol) and retained its original shape. Hence, such innovative masks have the potential for reusability and longer life.

During the outbreak, many countries experienced challenges in procuring sufficient quantities of quality masks. Properly designed and validated reusable masks can protect people during similar outbreaks, prevent the spread of viruses and save resources. At the same time, if everyone wears a mask, this can also help to alleviate the anxiety of the public. Reusable masks will play an important role in pandemic spread prevention and control in special circumstances.

Antivirus masks

An anti-virus mask is a mask that kills or eliminates viruses in a short time while ensuring basic filtration performance while wearing.

Anti-virus masks are an essential need because although viruses such as SARS-CoV-2 are blocked by the filter, they will still live on the surface of the filter for a long time. This creates the possibility of secondary infection, especially when a doctor saves a patient. A recent study found that SARS-CoV-2 has extremely strong survivability in the environment [19]. SARS-CoV-2 can survive at least 3 h in aerosols, at least 72 h on the surface of plastic and steel, and even on the surface of copper with certain antibacterial properties, it can survive for more than 8 h. Therefore, in places where viruses are common, such as hospitals and patient isolation areas, anti-virus masks are needed to protect front-line medical staff and undiagnosed patients.

According to media reports, some institutions have begun to conduct corresponding research (Table 5). In addition, although not disclosed, many other institutions and companies are making efforts to manufacture anti-virus masks.

Table 5 Recent research on anti-virus masks reported in the media

The efforts of institutions and companies in this area are impressive. However, there are still some issues worth noting. The current challenge in designing an anti-virus mask is that (i) it must kill the virus in a short time (ideally in a few seconds). Although there are many antiviral materials, their virus-killing speed still needs to be verified; (ii) the antiviral materials used must be safe. Media reports (Table 5) show that many institutions are using nanomaterials or nanoreagents, which have hidden dangers and require further experimental verification; (iii) the anti-viral material needs to have good durability on the mask. Related tests have not seemed to attract attention.

In addition, most current research is focused on the development or selection of antiviral materials. However, these antiviral materials may cause safety problems. With this in mind, some physical antiviral methods may be a better choice, such as using non-adhesive surfaces or manufacturing antiviral nanostructures. These physical antiviral structures will not fall off and may provide long-lasting antiviral effects. However, materials in this area still need to be developed.

In view of the important role of antivirus masks, governments and manufacturers should quickly formulate corresponding product standards, including the characterization of virus-killing speed, safety test methods and requirements for durability. In this regard, material innovation will greatly promote the development of the entire industry chain.

Degradable masks

An increasing number of people are wearing masks to prevent the spread of the virus in the community. However, another problem caused by this approach is the accompanying “mask pollution”. Obviously, current masks have no self-cleaning function. A recent survey trip to the Soko islands in Hong Kong was conducted by an environmental group. 70 discarded masks were collected within 100 meters of the beach [20]. These masks will slowly break down into microplastics, entering food chains with devastating effects.

A degradable mask is a mask that has basic filtering performance and can be biodegraded after being discarded. From the perspective of sustainable development, degradable masks are an important part of the “masking strategy”. However, these masks involve the challenge of high manufacturing costs (from both production and materials) with the current design because this mask design requires that every part be biodegradable.

A novel mask design may solve the cost problem. Two Japanese companies are promoting the reuse of washable face masks to help address the shortage of face masks worldwide while simultaneously striving to improve the environmental footprint by using renewable biomass-based resources, including polylactic acid (PLA) [21].

In addition to knitted masks, we believe that masks with replaceable filters may be a good choice (Fig. 5). The shell design of replaceable filter masks can be varied; they can fit the face better (designed separately for adults and children) and even use sterilizable materials. More importantly, they can be stored and recycled to avoid pollution caused by discarding. In this design, the filter can be prepared using degradable materials. These replaceable filter masks have the potential to reduce costs to a range acceptable to consumers while meeting environmental protection requirements. To avoid the risks of secondary infection, these masks should be disinfected after wearing. Since the filter uses degradable materials, the filter can be directly discarded after disinfection. At the same time, because there is no need to maintain the filtration efficiency of the filter, any sterilization method can be used, such as spraying medical alcohol. It is only necessary to ensure the integrity of the mask shell.

Fig. 5
figure5

Schematic diagram of masks with replaceable filter

Science, business, standards, and policy innovations are needed to replace petrochemically derived plastics with degradable bioplastics derived from renewable sources [22]. Designing products with end-of-life considerations and life cycle engineering opens up opportunities for economic growth and new jobs while improving the quality of the environment.

Conclusions

The outbreak of COVID-19 is an unprecedented challenge in recent human history. Wearing a mask has been proven to be an important means to prevent the spread of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. However, the shortage of masks is a major problem worldwide. This article provides quality information on SARS-CoV-2 virus protection with a masking strategy. We discuss possible measures to solve the shortage of masks. Disinfecting used masks using appropriate methods and making homemade masks are two emergency solutions in times of mask shortage, while innovative reusable masks, antivirus masks, and degradable masks are becoming essential for society in the long run. We also provide the definitions, basic requirements, materials, possible preparation methods and challenges of these innovative masks in this review. Science, business, standards, and policy innovations are needed to support these promising areas. Innovative masks will help us overcome the current difficulties and cope with an epidemic like COVID-19 in the future.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

COVID-19:

pandemic coronavirus disease 2019

SARS-CoV-2:

severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2

ACE2:

angiotensin-converting enzyme 2

ARDS:

acute respiratory distress syndrome

N95:

a particulate-filtering facepiece respirator that meets the U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) N95 classification of air filtration

FFP:

filtering facepiece mask

AI:

artificial intelligence

CDC:

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

NIOSH:

U.S. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health

VHP:

Vaporous hydrogen peroxide

UVGI:

ultraviolet germicidal irradiation

References

  1. 1.

    Zhang S, Wang Y, Rauch A, Wei F. Unprecedented disruption of lives and work: health, distress and life satisfaction of working adults in China one month into the COVID-19 outbreak. Psychiatry Res. 2020;288:112958.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    WHO Coronavirus Disease (COVID-19) Dashboard, World Health Organization website. 2020. https://covid19.who.int/. Accessed 5 June 2020.

  3. 3.

    Shortage of personal protective equipment endangering health workers worldwide, World Health Organization website. 2020. https://www.who.int/news-room/detail/03-03-2020-shortage-of-personal-protective-equipment-endangering-health-workers-worldwide. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  4. 4.

    Wikimedia Commons, Title of subordinate document. 3D medical animation corona virus.jpg. 2020. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:3D_medical_animation_corona_virus.jpg Accessed 31 May 2020.

  5. 5.

    Letko M, Marzi A, Munster V. Functional assessment of cell entry and receptor usage for SARS-CoV-2 and other lineage B betacoronaviruses. Nat Microbiol. 2020;5:562–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Consensus document on the epidemiology of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), DEPARTMENT OF COMMUNICABLE DISEASE SURVEILLANCE AND RESPONSE. 2013. https://www.who.int/csr/sars/en/WHOconsensus.pdf Accessed 31 May 2020.

  7. 7.

    Sanche S, Lin Y, Xu C, Romero-Severson E, Hengartner N, Ke R. High contagiousness and rapid spread of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2020. https://doi.org/10.3201/eid2607.200282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Sungnak W, Huang N, Becavin C, Berg M, Queen R, Litvinukova M, Lopez C, Maatz H, Reichart D, Sampaziotis F, Worlock K, Yoshida M, Barnes J. HCA Lung Biological Network, SARS-CoV-2 entry factors are highly expressed in nasal epithelial cells together with innate immune genes. Nat Med. 2020;26:681.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Wei J, Li Y. Airborne spread of infectious agents in the indoor environment. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44:S102–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Loudon RG, Roberts RM. Singing and the dissemination of tuberculosis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1968;98:297–300.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    WHO Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) situation reports. https://www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019/situation-reports. Accessed 31 May 2020.

  12. 12.

    Kai D, Goldstein G, Morgunov A, Nangalia V, Rotkirch A, Universal Masking is Urgent in the COVID-19 Pandemic: SEIR and Agent Based Models, Empirical Validation, Policy Recommendations, arXiv:2004.13553v1, 22 Apr 2020. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2004.13553.pdf Accessed 31 May 2020.

  13. 13.

    Decontamination and Reuse of Filtering Facepiece Respirators, CDC. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/hcp/ppe-strategy/decontamination-reuse-respirators.html Accessed 29 June 2020.

  14. 14.

    Liao L, Xiao W, Zhao M, Yu X, Wang H, Wang Q, Chu S, Cui Y. Can N95 respirators be reused after disinfection? how many times? ACS Nano. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03597.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Recommendation Regarding the Use of Cloth Face Coverings, Especially in Areas of Significant Community-Based Transmission, CDC. 2020. https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-ncov/prevent-getting-sick/cloth-face-cover.html. Accessed 31 May 2020.

  16. 16.

    Konda A, Prakash A, Moss GA, Schmoldt M, Grant GD, Guha S. Aerosol filtration efficiency of common fabrics used in respiratory cloth masks. ACS Nano. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsnano.0c03252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Liu C, Hsu P, Lee H, Ye M, Zheng G, Liu N, Li W, Cui Y. Transparent air filter for high-efficiency PM2.5 capture. Nat Commun. 2015;6:6205.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Brown EN, These face masks are designed to be washed and reused, Fast company website. 2020. https://www.fastcompany.com/90480804/these-face-masks-are-designed-to-be-washed-and-reused. Accessed 29 June 2020.

  19. 19.

    Doremalen N, Morris D, Holbrook M, Gamble A, Williamson B, Tamin A, Harcourt J, Thornburg N, Gerber S, Smith J, Wit E, Munster V. Aerosol and surface stability of SARS-CoV-2 as compared with SARS-CoV-1. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:16.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Mavrokefalidis D, Coronavirus face masks ‘could have a devastating effect on the environment, Energy Live News website. 2020. https://www.energylivenews.com/2020/03/17/coronavirus-face-masks-could-have-a-devastating-effect-on-the-environment/. Accessed 27 May 2020.

  21. 21.

    Haydn Davis, Japanese partnership produces sustainable facemasks, Knitting Trade Journal. 2020 https://www.knittingtradejournal.com/flat-knitting-news/14123-japanese-partnership-produces-sustainable-facemasks. Accessed 31 May 2020.

  22. 22.

    Ramakrishna S. Guest editorial: circular economy and sustainability pathways to build a new-modern society. Dry Technol. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1080/07373937.2020.1758492.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The design of the study and writing the manuscript was supported by the NUS COVID-19 Research Seed Funding (Reference No: NUSCOVID19RG-11).

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

DXJ wrote the paper, XXL collected media information, DXJ, LF and SR planned the content of the article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Dongxiao Ji or Li Fan.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ji, D., Fan, L., Li, X. et al. Addressing the worldwide shortages of face masks. BMC Mat 2, 9 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s42833-020-00015-w

Download citation

Keywords

  • COVID-19
  • Epidemic prevention measures
  • Mask
  • Reusable
  • Antiviral
  • Sustainable development
  • Transmission of virus